Monday, June 1, 2015

Google Wants To Be Your Everything

Google wants to be everywhere you — and your data — are.

Google

Ninety minutes into today’s Google I/O keynote, at the precise moment my right buttcheek began to notify me that it was about to fall into a most uncomfortable, tingling sleep, a Google executive booted up Spotify on her Android phone and started playing a Skrillex song from the stage. I rolled my eyes. Then, as the interminable pulsing beat wormed its way to the inevitable drop, the executive tapped the phone’s screen and posed a question to the device’s black mirror: What’s his real name? Without hesitation, the phone redirected to a familiar white Google page proudly displaying the answer — Sonny John Moore — along with a picture of the undercut-having, beat-dropping DJ looking angsty. The feature was part of Google’s Now on Tap mobile search, which reads the context of whatever app you have open and delivers answers to queries based on what you’re doing in the moment. The demo was simple, elegant, and enough to make me forget, at least for a moment, about my right buttcheek.

If you’re looking to understand what Google hopes to accomplish with its wildly popular Android operating system in the coming years, Now on Tap is a good place to start. It’s a sleek, impressive, and ambitious demonstration of machine learning that sits always at attention, ready to sift through the pile of data your smartphone is constantly producing in order to make your life easier. Now on Tap is the connective tissue between you and your apps and the internet at large — your very own search butler. And if it works as seamlessly on a street corner as it does from the comfy confines of a keynote stage, it’s also a triumph that suggests Google is poised to surpass Apple when it comes to mobile design.

Late Apple chief Steve Jobs rather famously noted that "design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works." By that definition, the company Jobs founded has reason to be more than a little spooked by today’s Android keynote. Taken together, the rather small Android product features that Google announced — gesture-controlled smartwatches, context-based mobile search, facial-recognition-powered photo searching and storage, offline maps with turn-by-turn directions, and lightweight mobile processing for the internet’s "next billion" users in the developing world — come together as a comprehensive suite of technology that appears to be without peer. Whether it’s a $100 smartphone designed as gateway to the internet in a place with historically low smartphone penetration or a $500 high-end gadget squarely targeted toward early adopters, the vast and comprehensive mobile ecosystem revealed in today's keynote is deeply in control of your data and nearly always in your life. It also, for lack of a better word, works.

On Tap in action.

Google

And that’s really all that matters when we’re talking about Android or iOS or any of the digital networks that surround every facet of our lives, both on- and offline. At its most extreme, a good suite of mobile products will not only hold its user hostage but also help them cultivate a healthy case of Stockholm syndrome. To do this it has to work. It has to be able to look at your photos and recognize faces and the places those faces were in when the shutter clicked. It has to be able to remind you that you’re going to Chicago next month and Hey, why don’t you give your lovely Aunt Mildred a ring since you guys haven’t seen each other in a bit and — well, would you look at that! Looks like it’s time for you to get in the car if you’re going to make that appointment in Menlo Park by 2:00 P.M. Today, Google proved Android is a powerful captor.

Of course, there’s a price for all of this. The price is your data — and, by proxy, your privacy. Want to be able to find that picture of your second cousin you took six years ago? Let us look at and analyze the faces in every single one of your photos to figure it out. Want to know Skrillex’s full name? Let us see what's in your headphones right now. Need that reminder to call your college roommate? Let us know where you are now and where you’re going to be next week and yeah, we should probably have your address book handy, too. You haven’t booked the trip yet? Don’t worry, we’ve got your search history right here so we figured you’d be booking the trip soon.

Let us know everything about you. We promise it’ll be worth your while.

Google's mission statement.

Charlie Warzel / BuzzFeed

This information and privacy tradeoff is nothing new, but today’s keynote showed perhaps the fullest realization of the power of buying into an ecosystem whole hog. And in contrast to Apple’s beautifully designed — and, in many cases, prohibitively expensive — hardware, Google touted and demonstrated Android’s ability to provide an immersive digital ecosystem at staggering scale. Google’s feel-good portion of the keynote, which focused on bringing the mobile web to the developing world, was as much about indoctrinating the next billion inside the Google ecosystem as it was about delivering universal access to information. And with dirt-cheap and powerful Chromebooks and Android One smartphones, Google is arguably the only company even capable of this kind of market grab.

If Google is successful with all this, it will prove to be an unprecedented level of control for a company that arguably has more access to individual information than any entity on the planet. During the vanity stats portion of the keynote, Google exec Sundar Pichai revealed that six separate Google services (search, YouTube, Maps, Gmail, Android, and Chrome) all have roughly 1 billion users or more. Even third-party apps, arguably the only escape hatch out of Google’s walled garden of software and hardware, operate within and must defer to Android’s connective tissue features if they want to take advantage of things like On Tap. Google I/O is billed as a conference for developers, and today Google courted them and made them hoot and holler and clap at a number of features that promise to make their programs better, faster, and more efficient. But almost every single feature on display today was about Google’s play for more control.

Mat Honan / BuzzFeed

In this sense, the keynote, which prominently featured female executives and employees of color, was strangely Jobsian. Sure, it lacked sexiness — at one point a Google executive asked the crowd if there were any Star Wars fans in the crowd, and was met with a deafening chorus of woos and applause — but it was a prominent display of ambition, control, and design. Rather than simply build into the Internet of Things, Google built and unveiled an operating system for it. Why be the one to physically manufacture the smart locks that will secure your home of the future when Google can build the infrastructure that the locks run on? That’s control.

Skrillex demonstration aside, very little about today’s keynote was flashy, exciting, or engineered to echo through the culture. It was a series of rather incremental updates; perfectly subdued glimpses of a digital ecosystem that is becoming more fully realized. Set against Apple’s flash and aesthetic, it was almost boring. But it’s this insidious power that makes Google not only a transformative tech company but an almost elemental force of nature. Sure, it wasn’t all that pretty, but everything fit together seamlessly. And, most importantly, it worked.


via IFTTT

Sports: Former FIFA Vice President Jack Warner Has No Idea That an Onion Article About FIFA Is a Spoof

Sports on TIME.com

Former FIFA Vice President Jack Warner Has No Idea That an Onion Article About FIFA Is a Spoof


The joke appears to be on Jack Warner

Published on June 1, 2015 at 08:01AM

Shared at 0 shares/hour


Read more: http://ift.tt/1HFI3ti

Top Rand Paul Consultant "Obsessed With Trying To Personally Destroy Me," Says Former Protégé

The last time Rex Elsass spoke in private with his longtime protégé and business partner Nick Everhart, the veteran high-powered Republican strategist offered up a strange prophecy.

It was an April morning in 2013, and in a few days their rancorous falling-out would make news, plunging one of the nation's leading GOP consulting firms into a state of upheaval. But at the moment, the two men were seated across from each other at a Bob Evans restaurant outside Columbus, Ohio. The mood was tense, their conversation stilted. Everhart wanted to clear the air; Elsass had something else in mind.

"I have plans for you to atone for my sins," Elsass said cryptically over his coffee, according to Everhart. "All you've done is speed up all the plans I already had for you."

Everhart didn't make much of the comment at the time. After 12 years of working as Elsass's right hand at Strategy Group for Media — a Republican political advertising shop where staff Bible studies are commonplace and paintings of Jesus adorn the walls — he had grown accustomed to tuning out his boss's grandiloquent sermonizing. He wishes now he had listened.

In an interview with BuzzFeed News, Everhart accused Elsass — who is now the top media consultant on Rand Paul's presidential campaign — of using his political clout and vast company resources to fanatically pursue a bitter "vendetta" against him. In the two years since Everhart was fired from Strategy Group, he said Elsass has gone to extraordinary lengths to torment him. Within a week of his ouster, he said the firm foreclosed on the home they had been paying for as part of his compensation. He said they hampered his job hunt by being almost comically belligerent in their enforcement of his non-compete clause. And he even suggested the criminal charges he's now facing are the result of Elsass putting pressure on a politically ambitious prosecutor.

To Everhart, the explanation for his former mentor's behavior is obvious.

"He is obsessed with trying to personally destroy me," he said of Elsass. "He wants me to be homeless, jobless, bankrupt, and in jail."

Elsass declined to answer specific questions from BuzzFeed News, citing the criminal charges Everhart still faces. "With the pending criminal trial, it's not appropriate for me to make any comments," he said.

But there's no question the two men have their share of personal baggage. Everhart was a lanky college kid when he first went to work for Elsass, the boisterous, back-slapping good ol' boy with a Bentley and a private jet. They bonded over their shared Christian faith, and together they built Strategy Group into one of the most combative and in-demand media shops in the GOP, getting hundreds of right-wing insurgents and tea partiers elected across the country. But as the company grew — and Everhart grew up — he said he became increasingly disillusioned with his boss. The high-flying lifestyle that had once seemed so alluring now struck Everhart as wasteful. The constant need for validation and attention that had once seemed tolerable now began to grate on him. And while he had once been flattered by Elsass effusively comparing their relationship to that of Paul and Timothy in the Bible, he wasn't sure how much longer he wanted to be a sidekick. All of it was beginning to take its toll.

"You had to almost nurture Rex's paranoia and anxiety about wanting to be the center of the universe, along with doing your full-time job," Everhart recalled.

By 2013, he and other top managers at the firm were growing concerned with what they saw as Elsass's increasingly erratic behavior, imprudent decision-making, and moral failings. They decided an intervention was in order, and one morning they confronted Elsass and urged him to seek out psychiatric help, pursue spiritual repentance — and relinquish some of his management authority. Elsass balked, and soon came to suspect that his most beloved disciple, Everhart, was secretly plotting a coup to seize control of his company. In response, he purged Strategy Group of the suspected turncoats, and filed a civil lawsuit accusing Everhart of trying to steal from the company.

Though he adamantly denies the allegations, Everhart believes he knows what's driving Elsass's animus.

"He really likes to believe he created me and owned me, and now that he's been spurned, the only logical recourse is to destroy me," Everhart said. "It's a pretty typical response of someone who's a narcissist... to lash out at someone who's betrayed you."

It took nearly a year for Everhart and Strategy Group to reach a settlement — but that was just the beginning. With the civil litigation over, Elsass promptly began turning over evidence to the Delaware County Prosecutor's Office and, the prosecutor confirmed, encouraging them to pursue criminal charges. On Oct. 17, 2014 — a full year and a half after he'd left the firm — Everhart was charged with two counts of hacking, and accused of enlisting an ex-employee to help him steal files from a Strategy Group computer. He said he was simply trying to retrieve photos of his kids. Either way, by now Everhart had landed at a new political firm that specialized in direct mail, and he found the disruptive timing of the indictments — just two weeks before the midterm elections — to be suspicious. He also wondered why news of the charges were leaked to political reporters before he found out about them. (The prosecutor's office confirmed they did not put out a press release.) Everhart said the circumstance suggested an uncommon coziness between Elsass and the prosecutor.

His wariness only deepened last month, when he was slapped with new charges of perjury and evidence tampering. He said he wasn't contacted by a single investigator or prosecutor prior to being indicted, and he believes the charges are based entirely on depositions from the civil suit he already settled last year with Strategy Group.

Everhart said he now thinks the purpose of Strategy Group's civil suit was for Elsass to "set a trap" designed to "put me in jail."

Carol O'Brien, the county prosecutor handling the cases, said there has been nothing abnormal about the process in Everhart's cases. She denied that the timing of the indictments was calculated, and said in this case "it wasn't necessary" for investigators to speak to Everhart before he was charged. Asked whether she was acting on pressure from Elsass and his firm, O'Brien responded, "Lots of victims pressure us. That's what victims do."

She added, "It doesn't do a prosecutor any good to indict a case based on pressure from a victim if the evidence doesn't show probable cause, because you'll just look like an idiot in trial."

But at least one legal expert following the case said he was "shocked" by O'Brien's decision to pursue criminal charges. Todd P'Pool got to know both Elsass and Everhart when he hired Strategy Group for his unsuccessful 2011 campaign for Kentucky attorney general. He said he occasionally keeps in touch with both men, and has "no strong opinion on their business dispute." But as a former local prosecutor who supervised around 50,000 cases, "from homicides to speeding tickets," he said he has never seen anything like this.

"Today, there were thousands of depositions taken across the country in civil cases, and believe it or not, there are people who lie in depositions," he said. "So, for a prosecutor to select one deposition and say, 'Oh, we're going to prosecute you for perjury,' it's just shocking to me... Ohio only has so many jail cells, and they need to be for violent criminals and people who would hurt children."

Everhart speculated that as a Republican, O'Brien would have plenty of cause to "make Rex happy" if she aspires to higher office one day, and that her ambitions could be motivating her to pursue the case — a serious accusation. Asked to respond, O'Brien dismissed the notion, and added, "My political ambitions are very minimal."

No matter what happens next month at Everhart's first trial, though, it's likely his former boss will be paying close attention. When he was arraigned last year, Everhart said he spotted one of Elsass's employees lurking on the perimeter of the courtroom and snapping pictures. According to someone who knows Elsass, he keeps at least one of the photos on his phone, and likes to show it off.

But with the Republican presidential primaries growing more crowded and competitive by the week, it's unclear how much the Paul campaign — which has already drawn criticism in some GOP circles for occasional amateurishness — will tolerate such distractions from its top media consultant.

Everhart, meanwhile, also questioned how well Elsass is serving his candidate, but for a different reason. "There's some obvious irony that Rex is a chief strategist in a presidential campaign that says it's all about criminal justice reform, when they've got prosecutors taking a very keen interest in very political matters," he said.

As Everhart awaits trial this summer, he is taking comfort in the hope that one way or another this ordeal will soon be over. "It can't go on forever," he said, sounding as though he was trying to convince himself. "Nothing does."

But as maddening as the last two years have been, he says he can now see their value. In the weeks after getting fired from Strategy Group, he often found himself roaming his house in the middle of the day while the lawyers worked out what kind of jobs he could pursue without violating his non-compete. One afternoon, he decided to start watching Mad Men for the first time, figuring its focus on advertising might help him with his professional withdrawal. As he watched, though, he was startled to find so much familiarity in the show's bleakness.

"You have this torn character and these giant, selfish personalities who are focused on hustling clients, and consumerism," Everhart said. He reflexively wanted to judge them, or stand apart from them, but he said he soon realized he was them. "Sometimes, a person's encapsulation of who they are is really how they do their job. I was someone who could be defined that way. And only when it was stripped away, did I realize it was just a job."

His epiphany became more potent when his wife told him that in the weeks leading up to the Strategy Group meltdown, she had been praying that something would change to improve life at home for their young family. Everhart had been routinely working 14-hour days or longer and traveling constantly. If he hadn't been fired, Everhart said, "I'm not sure my marriage and family would have stayed together."

Maybe he'll get a chance to thank Elsass for that inadvertent gift one day. Everhart said he's tried calling, but never gets through. "I don't hate Rex," he insisted. "I feel bad for him. He's obviously someone who's gone through a lot of personal struggles in his life. I just wish he'd pick up the phone and ask the prosecutor to stop, because he has that power."



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1GPIUvm

Ted Cruz Does JFK Impression And Argues He'd Be A Republican Today

“There is no room for John F. Kennedys in the modern Democratic Party.”

In Massachusetts over the weekend, Cruz argued "JFK would be a Republican today," because he supported tax cuts.

youtube.com

Here's the impression:

View Video ›

buzzfeed-video1.s3.amazonaws.com

Both John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy actually used the line — John in Ireland and Bobby in a speech at the University of Kansas — quoting George Bernard Shaw.

"This is an extraordinary country," John F. Kennedy said. "George Bernard Shaw, speaking as an Irishman, summed up an approach to life: Other people, he said "see things and...say 'Why?' ...But I dream things that never were — and I say: 'Why not?'"

Said Robert Kennedy in the 1968 speech, "George Bernard Shaw once wrote, 'Some people see things as they are and say why? I dream things that never were and say, why not?'"

Impressions are kind of Cruz's thing. Here's Churchill:

vine.co


View Entire List ›



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1K3cDlm

Rand Paul's Symbolic NSA Spying Victory Could Have A Steep Price

“We shouldn’t be disarming unilaterally as our enemies grow more sophisticated and aggressive,” Rand Paul’s patron, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. Rand Paul in happier times.

John Sommers II / Reuters

WASHINGTON — The Senate reluctantly agreed to take up a modified reauthorization of the Patriot Act that includes modest controls on the federal domestic surveillance programs, handing a victory of sorts of Sen. Rand Paul who had opposed any extension of the Patriot Act.

Following an hour-long closed-door meeting of the Senate Republican conference on Sunday, the chamber voted 77 to 17 to begin debate on the USA Freedom Act. That bill, which creates a new electronic surveillance system and makes some changes to the Patriot Act, has already passed the House and has the blessing of the intelligence community.

The agreement came over the objections of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who opposes the House bill and had aggressively pushed for a short-term extension of the Patriot Act, without changes.

"We shouldn't be disarming unilaterally as our enemies grow more sophisticated and aggressive. And we certainly should not be doing so based on a campaign of demagoguery and disinformation launched in the wake of the unlawful actions of Edward Snowden, who was last seen in Russia," McConnell said angrily in a floor speech prior to the vote.

Although a boon for Paul's campaign coffers thanks to a relentless fundraising campaign based around the spying debate, it is a pyrrhic victory for the Kentucky Republican: the Patriot Act will only expire in the most nominal sense as of midnight Sunday. The law includes "wind down" provisions that will mean the NSA and other intelligence agencies will see little change in their ability to conduct on going domestic electronic surveillance, although no new data collections could be started.

Rep. Justin Amash, who has been a fierce opponent of the Patriot Act, acknowledged there is little substantive meaning to the expiration, but that it could have significant political consequences.

"The hours aren't significant … what is significant is that at midnight the Patriot Act expires, and I think from a legislative standpoint, someone looking at what they're going to authorize has to think of it like that. That they are authorizing something from scratch. There will be a lot of Democrats out there who will face incredibly tough primaries if the vote to basically reauthorize the Patriot Act from scratch after it expires," Amash told reporters prior to the vote.

Paul's decision to force the symbolic expiration of the law could also carry a high political cost — the support of McConnell.

Although Paul initially rubbed not only McConnell but the entire GOP conference the wrong way when he first came to the Senate, the two Kentuckians eventually came to an understanding, which allowed Paul to use the Senate as a megaphone to pursue his policy positions while not throwing monkey wrenches into McConnell's broader plans.

The arrangement took on added significance when Paul became a key ally in McConnell's re-election campaign last year. A number of top Paul staffers joined team McConnell, and Paul's work as a surrogate in the state helped McConnell defeat conservative upstart Matt Bevin during the primary campaign.

In return, McConnell quickly threw his weight behind Paul's presidential campaign. And while McConnell made it clear he won't use his position as leader to help Paul, the simple act of the laying of hands on Paul by the leader of the GOP's establishment faction has helped Paul's standing.

But Paul's open defiance could cost him in the future. McConnell has aggressively pushed Senate Republicans to vote against the USA Freedom Act, and instead to vote for an extension of the Patriot Act, and he had hoped that by backing up the original vote on the bill to last week's congressional recess, he could prevail. But when Paul didn't budge, McConnell found himself in the embarrassing position of either moving forward with the House's bill or simply letting the law expire.

And on Sunday, the senior senator from Kentucky — who is not known for his capacity to forgive and forget — was clearly displeased with his home state colleague.

"It is now clear that [reauthorization] will not be possible in the face of determined opposition from those who simply wish to end the counterterrorism program altogether," McConnell said icily, looking over at Paul.



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1dFjJAu

Martin O'Malley Warns Rand Paul's Patriot Act Moves Could Make America Less Safe

Some progressives have signed on to Rand Paul’s nuclear assault on the Patriot act. Martin O’Malley is not one of them.

O'Malley in New Hampshire today

Evan McMorris-Santoro

BEDFORD, New Hampshire — Martin O'Malley's push to become the progressive alternative in the Democratic presidential race does not extend to the fight over the PATRIOT Act.

Near the end of his second event of the day, a crowded meet-and-greet at a supporter's home perched on a Granite State mountainside, O'Malley raised the raging Senate fight over the PATRIOT Act unfolding in Washington as he spoke.

"We are right now, and I know it's hard to believe when you see some cable news stations, when you see Congress threatening to adjourn before fixing the PATRIOT Act, the fact of the matter is we are on the threshold of a new era of American progress," said O'Malley, the former governor of Maryland, in part of a longer answer about how he would break the gridlock in Washington since 2011.

Rand Paul, a Republican senator from Kentucky, led the Senate to a rare and highly contentious Sunday session while O'Malley spoke in Bedford. Paul promised to use Senate procedure to force an expiration of the PATRIOT Act over his concerns over domestic surveillance programs. Paul's effort has earned him the ire of some Republicans — and the support of some progressive groups like the ACLU and NAACP who are wary of the domestic surveillance programs.

In his first 48 hours as a presidential candidate — going from Baltimore, the city he led as mayor, to Iowa and New Hampshire, two states he needs to make a mark in if he wants to have any chance at defeating Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton — O'Malley has often touted himself as a progressive alternative, promising vigorous opposition to President Obama's trade-policy plans and suggesting Clinton is too close to Wall Street to take on the problems of the middle class.

When it comes to Paul's push in Washington, however, O'Malley stands in the mainstream. In a brief Q&A with reporters after the house party, he told BuzzFeed News Congress needs to pass the USA Freedom Act, which has been pitched by supporters as a package to reform the PATRIOT Act. USA Freedom is supported by the White House and a bipartisan coalition in Congress and viewed with skepticism by libertarians and progressives who say it doesn't do enough to shut down domestic spying programs they say are in conflict with the Constitution. O'Malley said he supported the package but proposed a couple of additional measures he said would go farther, such as a public advocate in FISA courts, the secret judiciary that rules on government surveillance requests.

O'Malley warned that Paul's actions in the Senate on Sunday could put Americans at risk.

"I think we could be less safe if we resort to obstructionism when it comes to something as important as protecting our homeland from the threat of terror attacks," he said.



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1FjSv88

English Soccer Stars Apologize, Sent Home After Video Of Racist Thai Orgy Leaks

The video obtained by the Sunday Mirror newspaper shows the three players engaging in sex acts with Thai women while making racist remarks.

The players then shared the video with friends back in the U.K., according to the Sunday Mirror.


View Entire List ›


via IFTTT

Can We Guess Your Age Based On Your Fast Food Preferences?

♬ Ba-da-ba-ba-bah, I’m quizzin’ it! ♬


via IFTTT

What Should Your Signature Drink Actually Be?

Because anyone who is anyone has a signature drink.


via IFTTT

How To Properly Hold Chopsticks

Got chopstick struggles?

BuzzFeed Blue / Via youtube.com


via IFTTT