Friday, September 2, 2016

Black Republicans Are Furious Over The Pastor Interviewing Donald Trump

Aaron P. Bernstein / Getty Images

On Saturday, Donald Trump will sit down for an interview with Wayne T. Jackson, a pastor in Michigan as part of his tentative black outreach efforts — and black Republicans are fuming.

For one thing, they say, Jackson isn’t conservative and doesn’t support Trump. But Jackson also presided over a ordination ritual some time ago that became a source of viral controversy.

The video published in 2013 shows Jackson mounting two male bishops on the ground as part of an “consecration” ceremony; the video drew scrutiny, with some criticizing it as sexual, and others saying it wasn’t sexual, but had no place in the church. Now it’s leading some conservative black Republican evangelicals and strategists to question the Trump’s commitment to outreach to black voters.

In interviews with black Republicans, several speaking on the condition of anonymity said they didn’t understand why the Trump campaign decided to go with Jackson, an unknown in black Republican circles. “We feel like they’re being ignored, that the campaign just doesn’t want to work with us.”

RNC strategist Telly Lovelace fielded a flood calls from black Republicans wanting to express their displeasure with the campaign's decision. Lovelace, two sources said, responded saying it was just that — the campaign's decision. Reached by BuzzFeed News, Lovelace declined to comment. A phone call to Jackson’s church was not answered and the voicemail inbox was full.

Jackson’s interview with Trump will be shown on Jackson’s Impact Network, which bills itself as as the only black “founded and operated national Christian TV network.” Jackson’s church is no longer called Impact Ministries International (churches often change names). Now called Great Faith Ministries, Jackson says he doesn’t support Trump, but that he owes it to his viewers and to Trump to allow him to address black voters. He told The Detroit News he plans to ask Trump if he is a racist.

Black conservatives have a litany of names they believe the campaign should have reached out to, including Rev. Gary Plummer, a prominent Detroit pastor who is the director of missions for the Church of God In Christ, and Rev. Roland Caldwell of Burnette Inspirations Baptist Church. At the same time, they understood that part of Trump’s strategy is to not spend the ad dollars in favor of free media like what Impact Network offers.

“You’ve got people in Detroit like Rev. Keith Butler who is a known entity national and locally, with credibility and credentials with Republicans,” said Raynard Jackson, the founder and chairman Black Americans for a Better Future PAC. “For the campaign to go with to self-professed Democrat who stated that he is not a Trump supporter of Trump is problematic.”

The selection showed the Trump campaign didn’t vet properly, said Rev. Ralph Chittams, the senior vice chairman for the Republican Party of the District of Columbia and an associate minister with the Forest Hill New Redeemer Baptist Church. Trump's campaign did not immediately respond on Thursday to an email message seeking comment on either the sentiment in this story or the video.

“In my network, our question is why would Mr. Trump, in his first foray reaching out to the black community go talk to this clown, the humping Bishop?” Chittams told BuzzFeed News. “To me, there’s no sexual connotation to what he did. But find me one seminarian who doesn’t think it wasn’t pure and utter foolishness that has no Biblical foundation whatsoever.”

Evangelicals have long criticized the ordination ritual, saying it had no biblical grounding.

youtube.com

In the ceremony, Jackson tells the men, “You got to be buried… you got to die.” With the contemporary gospel song “I Give Myself Away” playing in the background, the men first laid face down on the ground. In the video depicting the ritual, Jackson circles them a number of times, appearing to grab their ankles. When the two men were covered, face down, in white sheets, Jackson then covered them in another red sheet, and promptly laid on top of each of them, one at a time, to the audience's approval. After being helped up, Jackson removed the sheets.

Jackson defended the act to Fox 2 Detroit as nonsexual, saying the bishops were being consecrated under his authority. “For somebody to take that and try to use that, you know, in a perverted way, we pray for them. We walk in love,” he said in an interview with Fox 2 Detroit. He lambasted detractors, saying, “if you're ignorant about something, you need to shut up.”

Some evidence shows that Jackson’s supporters worked to have the videos removed from the internet. Before one, on a YouTube channel titled “Exit Churchianity,” a script reads “Attention Wayne Jackson defenders: A false DMCA complaint was filed against this video, so I filed a counter-notice to pursue legal action. In response, YouTube RESTORED this video. So if you try to censor criticism of this video by filing a false DMCA complaint, I will pursue legal action against you. LET IT BE KNOWN.”

Republican operatives and evangelicals say there is real outreach to be done with black Republicans.

“We’re all catching all kinds of grief simply by being members of the party of Lincoln. Come talk to us,” Chittams said.

Raynard Jackson said it’s embarrassing to loyal black Republicans that the Trump campaign would look past Marvin Winans of Perfecting Church is “political malpractice.”

Added Chittam, “We want to support the nominee, but that nominee needs to talk to black conservatives and Republicans, and not this Democrat. He needs to come to talk to us and earn that support. Give us the reason to support you.”



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2bHIPQL

Snapchat's Head Of News Rips Cable News Coverage Of Trump

Thomas B. Shea / AFP / Getty Images

Snapchat head of news Peter Hamby, who spent years at CNN as a reporter covering politics, ripped into the cable news industry on Thursday for its coverage of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

How the news media covers Trump — especially the wall-to-wall coverage of his early campaign on cable — has been a point of major debate this election cycle, with many pointing fingers at CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News for turning over their platforms to Trump in the summer of 2015.

In his the seventh episode of his Snapchat original series, "Good Luck America," Hamby, who left CNN for Snapchat in April 2015, says Trump "has brought out the worst impulses of the media this year, and the media seem to be loving every minute of it."

"Are you watching the same shit I'm seeing on TV every day? Because the news media is a mess," Hamby says at the top of the episode.

The episode highlights some notable (and comedic) examples of TV news journalists going soft on Trump, including Bloomberg's Mark Halperin asking the candidate if he owns jeans. At one point, Hamby says, "you can even kiss Donald Trump's ass on live television" before playing a clip of MSNBC's Joe Scarborough praising Trump on air.

Hamby argues that Trump has been good for the news business, which has led to countless hours of coverage of his candidacy. While there has been some quality reporting on the candidate, it doesn't get as much attention as the ridiculous coverage, he added.

The episode is available through Snapchat Discover, which is viewed by 100 million users each month, according to the company. Nielsen research commissioned by the company showed that the app reaches 41% of all 18-34 year-olds in the US every day.

“You guys should demand better from the news," Hamby concludes. "The powers that be might actually mix it up if they thought it would get people under the age of 60 to watch TV.”

Check out some clips of the episode:

youtube.com

youtube.com

youtube.com




Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2cul01Z

Sports: Penn State to Honor Former Coach Joe Paterno in Upcoming Game

Sports on TIME.com

Penn State to Honor Former Coach Joe Paterno in Upcoming Game


To commemorate the 50th anniversary of Paterno’s first game as head coach

Published on September 2, 2016 at 12:08AM

Shared at 0 shares/hour


Read more: http://ift.tt/2cuhXXn

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Sports: Colin Kaepernick Criticized for Socks Depicting Police as Pigs

Sports on TIME.com

Colin Kaepernick Criticized for Socks Depicting Police as Pigs


“I expect more from the NFL."

Published on September 1, 2016 at 11:28PM

Shared at 0 shares/hour


Read more: http://ift.tt/2bMGbX4

Baffled Republicans Wonder: Who Was Trump’s Immigration Speech For?

Ralph Freso / Getty Images

In the wake of Donald Trump's hardline immigration speech Wednesday night, Republicans throughout the party largely abandoned discussion of a late push to win over Latinos, and seemed instead to focus on a new question: Which white voters can the candidate still reach?

Trump's much-hyped speech in Phoenix came after two rollercoaster weeks in which the nominee flailed and flip-flopped on the immigration issue, and suggested he was "softening" his stance. This brief flirtation with moderation led many to speculate that Trump was courting Hispanic voters — a theory that was buoyed by the candidate's last-minute meeting with the Mexican president Wednesday.

But interviews with a wide range of Republicans — from unabashed Trump supporters to #NeverTrump bitter-enders — suggested few in the party are still clinging to that hope.

Ari Fleischer, the former White House press secretary and a reluctant Trump supporter, praised the nominee's visit to Mexico, which he said made Trump "appear more presidential" and could help win over "college-educated voters, a group with whom he's greatly underperforming."

But as for courting Latinos, Fleischer said, "I'm afraid it's too late. He likely has already made too many Hispanics think he doesn't want them in the country. They're not listening to his next sentence. He's already lost too much support that his words now won't make any meaningful difference."

David Kochel, an Iowa-based Republican operative and former campaign strategist for Jeb Bush, interpreted Trump's immigration speech as a "decision to play directly to [his] already secured base."

"It has to be their calculation that they can drive up turnout in white working-class areas of battleground states to dizzying heights," Kochel said. "Otherwise this move makes no sense 69 days from the election." In any case, he added, "The 'softening' of Trump's immigration policy died tragically on Wednesday night in Phoenix. Foul play is suspected."

Republicans and conservatives remained sharply divided over the wisdom and effectiveness of Trump's immigration tough talk — but there was little disagreement about its intended audience. While right-wing Trump boosters like Ann Coulter celebrated on Twitter Wednesday night, several Hispanic campaign surrogates openly discussed rescinding their support for Trump.

"I thought a lot about union members, veterans, and moms in Rust Belt states and how they might be receiving this speech ... I could easily visualize countless heads nodding 'yes,'" said Keith Appell, a conservative strategist who supports Trump.

Greg Mueller, Appell's business partner and fellow Trump supporter, hailed Wednesday as "one of the best days of [Trump's] campaign."

Cato Institue immigration policy analyst Alex Nowrasteh, meanwhile, said, "Trump's aim was to shore up his base — in late August. ... The speech was one big dog whistle to anti-immigration populists."

Nowrasteh, who opposes Trump, added, "After this speech, nobody can claim Trump has softened his policy. When he loses in November it will be because his immigration stance is wildly out of step with voters."



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2bMsF6a

Kaine Compares Trump Immigration Speech To "No Irish Need Apply" Era

Alex Wong / Getty Images

DOVER, N.H. — Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine on Thursday likened Donald Trump's view of Mexican immigrants and Mexican-Americans to the discrimination once faced by 19th and 20th century Irish, Italians, and European Jews entering the United States.

Kaine launched the attack in response to the strict immigration speech from Trump late Wednesday night in Phoenix delivered mere hours after his far more conciliatory visit with Mexico's president, Enrique Peña Nieto.

"He went on a rampage with words of division, trashing people who are Mexican-American basically — saying things about them that people have said about the Irish or about the Italians or about Jews coming from Central and Eastern Europe,” Kaine told a group of volunteers at a Democratic Party office here in Dover, kicking off a day of campaign stops in New Hampshire.

"Pretty much any group that's come into this country that has made our nation such a fantastic nation — they faced a few people who were saying bad things about them, who said 'no Irish need apply," said Kaine. "That was the speech that Donald Trump gave last night."

The comments only add to the picture painted with increasing intensity by Kaine and his running-mate Hillary Clinton of Trump as a candidate who trades in racism and prejudice.

Last week, in a major address in Reno, Clinton highlighted her opponent's ties to the alt-right movement, which has nativist, white nationalist elements, and has become known for its online harassment of minorities. The next day, during a visit to a historically black college in Florida, Kaine went further, saying that Trump held "Ku Klux Klan values" and that his campaign was "pushing their values."

For months, Democrats up and down the ballot have denounced Trump's campaign as one grounded in hate and division. But as the race has closed in on its final two months, Clinton and Kaine have become more aggressive in their attacks. While they are both careful to avoid the designation itself, they have in effect made the case that Trump is racist.

“There’s an old Mexican proverb that says, ‘Tell me with whom you walk, and I will tell you who you are,’” Clinton said during the Reno speech, which outlined the various alt-right figures Trump has associated with this year.

“Well," she said, "we know who Trump is.”

On Wednesday, after weeks of hinting at a softening of his immigration policies, Trump promised a wall would be built and that a deportation force would be established. He also said the current legal immigration system — the type and level of workers accepted into the United States — would be updated to protect American workers.

The campaign dispatched Kaine to offer a response to the speech in six back-to-back morning news shows — the latest in a recent series of searing attacks on Trump from the Virginia senator, who is not known as a politician who relishes negative campaigning.

At the campaign event later on Thursday, a quick meet-and-greet at a volunteer office here in Dover, state Democratic chair Raymond Buckley introduced Kaine by calling Trump's speech "absolutely shameful, absolutely shameful," he said with a grave look.

Kaine, taking the microphone after brief remarks from his wife, Anne Holton, also described Trump as cowardly for balking in the meeting with Peña Nieto on his promise to somehow force Mexico to pay for a wall along the US border.

"When he sat down and he looked President Peña Nieto in the eye, he didn't have the guts to bring that up. Then he flew back and boy, when he got back here — 'We're gonna make Mexico do this!'" Kaine bellowed, imitating Trump.

"He had the chance to sit down and look the other leader in the eye, it was like he choked, he caved, he lost his confidence, he lost his will," Kaine said. "We all know people like that. They're gonna talk a good game but when the chips are down — [when] it's the point where if you've got an opinion, if something matters to you, you say it — they fold like an accordion."

"And that's what Donald Trump did yesterday," he said.

Kaine did not address in great detail the policies Trump put forward in Wednesday's speech, only telling Democrats here that they would boil down to even more deportations.

"He has made the very center of his campaign, we're gonna be deportation nation," Kaine said, arguing that the U.S. should strive to be an "innovation nation" and "inclusion nation."

"Donald Trump wants us to be the deportation nation," he said again.



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2bH4NmY

"Weiner Wednesday" Put On A Hiatus Following Sexting Scandal

Shannon Stapleton / Reuters

Anthony Weiner's new sexting scandal has lost him another gig.

On Wednesday, it was announced Weiner's recurring segment on the Fernand Amandi Radio Show on News Radio 610 WIOD Miami, known as "Weiner Wednesday" would be put on hiatus for the time being.

"I think it is clear Anthony Weiner has a problem beyond a normal peccadillo or vice, this is clearly is an issue that needs and requires psychological treatment and medical attention and professionalism," Armandi said.

"We will be putting the 'Weiner Wednesdays' segment on hiatus for the time being and hope that Anthony Weiner gets the help that he clearly needs, given this situation continues to happen," he added.

Weiner was recently placed on "indefinite leave" from NY1, where he was a regular contributor. The New York Daily News also announced it had dropped the former congressman as a columnist.

Weiner did not return a request for comment.



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2bTy7o2

Trump CEO Denied Calling A Woman A "Bimbo” – But It Was Caught On Tape

youtube.com

In the early 1990s, Trump campaign CEO chairman Steve Bannon was hired to fix a troubled Arizona project to simulate the surface of Mars. Biosphere II was plagued with problems — soaring costs, internal conflicts — and years of legal proceedings would follow.

In 1994, a former employee, Abigail Alling was indicted for damaging the facility during a break-in that she said was intended to warn crew members that new management, including Bannon, couldn’t safely run the project.

As part of Alling’s defense, her attorneys presented a partial transcript of a conversation Bannon had on April 17, 1994 — four days before Bannon delivered his grand jury testimony in the case against Alling — in which Bannon discusses his plan to deliver a “reality check” to her and “kick her ass.” The conversation was recorded by Biosphere II engineer William Dempster.

Bannon initially denied making the disparaging comments about Alling, according to court documents reviewed by BuzzFeed News. In the recordings obtained by BuzzFeed News, Bannon referred to her as a “bimbo,” “self-centered,” and “deluded.” In the recordings, he vows to take comments the woman made about the safety of the research facility they worked at and “ram it down her fucking throat.”

Bannon made the remarks, which were reported at the time by the Tucson Citizen and have been resurfaced by several news outlets this year, in the course of legal action involving Biosphere II, an Arizona research facility where Bannon was working as a consultant and interim director.

“I have never had an engineering mishap at sea and I am not about to have a 29-year-old bimbo criticize the people at this place for running something — compare it to the Challenger — compare us to the Rockwell — the O-rings — do you realize how mad that made me?” Bannon is heard saying on one part of the recording.

In another part of the conversation, Bannon says, “She thinks she’s a goddess. She thinks she’s above us all. She thinks she’s transformed something that we are not worthy of. Well you know what, I don’t buy that. I think she’s a self-centered, deluded young woman and she is about to get a reality check that I’m going to deliver to her.”

At one point, Bannon said he was going to take how the facility was run while Alling was still an employee and “ram it down her fucking throat.’

Alling did not did not return a request for comment on this story. Dempster declined to comment. A Bannon spokeswoman did not return a request for comment.

Bannon originally was brought on to Biosphere II as a consultant to cut costs in 1993. In 1994, after he was not allowed by the management to audit the project’s records, Biosphere II’s financial backer got a court order to take control of the project and an order to bar the current management employees from the premises. Bannon was then given full control of the project.

A partial transcript of a pretrial interview with Alling’s lawyer submitted by the defense in support of its motion to dismiss the case show that Bannon initially denied making the comments. The interview took place before he was aware that his conversation had been taped.

Alling’s defense attorney, Jesse Smith, asked Bannon in a pre-trial interview if he was aware that, though he was not under oath in the interview, that because it was a criminal prosecution the consequences were the same in that giving a “knowing false answer” or failing to tell the whole truth “could be construed as an obstruction of justice” (No formal allegations of obstruction of justice were ever raised).

Bannon replied, “Yes, sir.” He repeated that answer when asked if he would conduct himself as if he were under oath.

Later in the interview, he said, twice, “I’ve never referred to Ms. Alling as a bimbo.”

Bannon was asked if he’d said he planned to ram anything “down her effing throat. Teach her a lesson. Anything like that?” He answered that he didn’t “think words like that were used” and similarly denied having heard his associates, such as fellow banker Martin Bowen, use such language to describe what they intended to do at the grand jury proceedings four days later.

Though he admitted that he was “probably not very complimentary” toward Alling in his conversation with Dempster, Bannon repeated later in the interview that, “I did not use any terminology, I believe, like that. But I was, with Bill [Dempster], ah, it was very, um, ah, I was very vocal about, ah this being, um, that these charges being, um, you know, pursued by us and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

Asked again, he admitted, “I may have used terminology particular like that last that you just mentioned, but I did not, never said it in relation to a grand jury. Never said it in relation to any event that was coming up.” He also said no when Smith asked if he’d said she was “going to get some very rough lessons here in relation to the grand jury proceedings.”




Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2bKU6go

Trump Fans Breathe Sigh Of Relief: He's Not Pivoting From Tough Immigration Talk

Ross D. Franklin / AP

PHOENIX — Talk of a humane appoach, or a "softening" on immigration by Donald Trump, gave way to his trademark tough talk of building a wall and rounding up "criminal aliens" during an immigration policy speech Wednesday at the Phoenix Convention Center, ending an 11-day trial balloon by his campaign.

Earlier in the day, Trump visited Mexico at the invitation of its president, Enrique Peña Nieto. Afterward, the Mexican leader said that he told Trump his country would not pay for a wall along the border as he has said Mexico would, after Trump saying the issue didn't come up.

For Trump's raucous fans in the crowd, the Mexico trip was wonderful, showcasing the statesman side of the Republican nominee. But they were ecstatic that instead of pivoting on immigration, he completed a 360 back to his original position.

"When he first started last year he was foot in the sand, we need to go at these issues as hard as possible," said Patrick Blair, a Trump supporter, who develops surgery centers. "At the town hall with [Fox News' Sean Hannity] he was talking about softening, so I thought he would back off 10%, but he did not and I'm happy with what he came out with, a lot of details, he had 10 points — it was more than I thought he would have."

For most of Trump's supporters like Blair, they came for the wall, and they got what they wanted, along with a plan to triple the number of ICE deportation agents. Trump even called them a "deportation task force" for those who have evaded justice — "like Hillary Clinton," he said.

Trump also said he would end the so-called "catch and release" of undocumented immigrants and have zero tolerance for "criminal aliens" whom he would begin deporting on day one. He did not specify how that policy would differ from that of the Obama administration, which has prioritized the removal of criminals. Just last week, as Trump openly pondered an immigration pivot before ultimately abandoning it, he noted that Obama had deported a record number of immigrants.

But the lingering questions didn't bother his supporters much, even some who differ with him on his trademark policy proposal.

"He really doubled down tonight," said Michael Toppeta, who works in information technology, voted for Gary Johnson in 2012 and has supported Ron Paul in the past. "Even though I don't agree with the wall, it's not unreasonable," he said, adding that defending the Second Amendment and protecting the conservative balance of the Supreme Court are two big reasons he supports Trump.

Carol Walters, who came from Chicago and has lived in Arizona for 14 years, wasn't in the middle of the crowd. She sat in a wheelchair toward the back, but she loved what she heard and said the wall is necessary because the United States is being flooded with undocumented immigrants.

"They're on welfare, food stamps, all the freebies, who's paying for that? You and I," she said. Leaning in, she said when undocumented immigrants go to the emergency room, they should pay some of the bill. "They should at least have some of it," she said.

"After what he did in Mexico I'm very happy. I thought it was the best performance. It was presidential two men with opposite backgrounds discussing issues — I thought he was very professional about it," Walters added.

Blair, like Walters, has developed a harder edge to his political views. He voted for McCain in 2008 and Romney in 2012, but laughed when he said he was one of the ones in the crowd who mercilessly booed when McCain's name was mentioned as a primary winner Tuesday by a Trump warm-up act.

The Mexico trip was a pleasant surprise, Blair said.

"People in Mexico weren't happy with what he said and the healing has to start sometime, he put an olive branch out," Blair said kindly, of the reaction to Trump's comments that Mexico sends criminals and rapists across the border.

But then added, "Mexico is our friend, we don't want a third-world enemy at our Southern border."

It was the kind of talk Willie Martinez, 25, standing out as one of the few Hispanics at the back of the room, had to hear for himself.

The West Phoenix native went to a high school that was 93% Latino, and he was a former Bernie Sanders supporter before turning to Hillary Clinton now. He came to the rally because he wanted to see if the media was fairly painting Trump's statements or just cutting them up into sound bites.

The media — a constant target of Trump, his campaign, and his supporters (who yelled "do your job!" Wednesday night) — gained one fan in Martinez.

"For the most part the media is pretty much right," he said after the rally, as satisfied Trump supporters walked past him. "He's just as crazy as people are saying he is."



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2bDAcsh

Texas Attorney General Jumps Into Lawsuits Over North Carolina's Anti-Transgender Law

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

Kirk Irwin / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Texas and 12 other states injected themselves on Wednesday into the ongoing legal battles over North Carolina's anti-LGBT law — by asking a federal judge to put those lawsuits on hold for now.

The law, HB 2, was passed earlier this year, and one of the provisions — the subject of several lawsuits — limits public restroom usage to people's biological sex.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, joined by 10 other state attorneys general and two governors, specifically asked U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder to put the Justice Department's pending challenge to that law on hold while other cases proceed.

The Obama administration has asked Schroeder to halt enforcement of the anti-transgender provision, and he heard arguments over that request on Aug. 1. Putting the cases on hold as Paxton and the other states' officials asked in the unusual filing on Wednesday (or denying the Obama administration's request, a move the brief also supports) would mean that the anti-transgender law would remain in effect for the time being.

Paxton and the state officials cite an injunction issued in the case that Texas and several other states brought against the Obama administration's pro-transgender policies as a key reason for judge in North Carolina to issue a stay in that case — despite the fact that the injunction issued in the Texas case specifically exempted previously initiated litigation from that order.

The legal fight that has erupted over transgender restroom usage in the past few years has, generally, taken three forms of cases: those filed by individuals challenging anti-transgender policies; those filed by states or state officials challenging the Obama administration's position that existing civil rights laws protect transgender people from discrimination; and those filed by the federal government challenging anti-transgender actions, policies, or laws.

U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder, hearing several of the many challenges to the North Carolina law, issued a narrow injunction this past week in a case brought by students and employees of the University of North Carolina against the state and university. In the injunction, he ordered the school and government not to enforce the part of HB 2 that limits public restroom usage to people's biological sex — but only as to the people who brought the lawsuit.

A big part of Schroeder's decision was based on a prior decision of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals — where appeals from federal courts in North Carolina are heard — holding that the Obama administration's interpretation that Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 protects transgender people from discrimination is a permissible interpretation of the regulations implementing that law. The school district in that case — Gloucester County School Board v. G.G. — currently is seeking Supreme Court review of the 4th Circuit's decision.

Schroeder has not, however, yet ruled on the more broad request by the Justice Department to halt all enforcement of that anti-transgender provision in HB 2.

The move by Paxton and the other state officials on Wednesday of asking to file a brief before Schroeder's court opposing the Obama administration's request was unusual because it came nearly a month after Schroeder held arguments in the matter. Paxton was joined on the brief by the attorneys general of Arkansas, Arizona, West Virginia, Alabama, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nebraska, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Utah — as well as the governors of Kentucky and Mississippi.

While ostensibly an opposition to the Justice Department's request for an injunction, the brief also was unusual because the state officials used it to urge Schroeder to put the North Carolina cases on hold — pressing the arguments that prevailed in front of the judge in Texas before Schroeder in North Carolina and arguing to Schroeder that the injunction should influence what he does next in the cases before him.

"While the Injunction [in the Texas case] does not specifically prevent DOJ from continuing this litigation," the state officials note, "and this Court has acknowledged the same" — referencing Schroeder's order from this past week — "it nonetheless supports ... staying these proceedings" until the Supreme Court decides whether to hear the appeal of the Gloucester case and until the 4th Circuit addresses an appeal of Schroeder's injunction regarding the individual plaintiffs and UNC.

Additionally, Paxton and the other state officials argue that the injunction in the Texas-led federal challenge supports "denying the [injunction] requested" by the Justice Department. "Indeed, now that the federal policies at issue are subject to a nationwide injunction, will be inspected again by the Fourth Circuit, and also scrutinized by the Supreme Court, granting the United States’ preliminary injunction motion would bestow upon North Carolina the distinction of making it the only State unable to enforce its policy regarding access to intimate areas," the brief argues.

Read the Texas-led brief:



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/2bDrVzt