Friday, May 1, 2015

Tea Party Senator Welcomes Hillary Clinton To Cause Of Criminal Justice Reform

After a shout-out in Clinton’s speech, Utah Sen. Mike Lee tells BuzzFeed News that conservatives have solutions for the issues surrounding Baltimore.

Darren McCollester / Getty

Republican Sen. Mike Lee told BuzzFeed News Thursday he welcomed Hillary Clinton's high-profile support for his efforts to overhaul criminal sentencing guidelines — and said he was encouraged by prominent Democrats' evolving views on criminal justice policy.

With violence enveloping Baltimore and demonstrators filling the streets to protest police brutality in the wake of Freddie Gray's death, Clinton delivered a sharply worded speech Wednesday calling for an end to the "era of mass incarceration." The Democratic presidential frontrunner proceeded to hail a "growing bipartisan movement" taking shape around these issues — and specifically name-checked Lee and Sen. Rand Paul as examples of conservatives joining the cause.

"Now, of course it is not enough just to agree and give speeches about it," she said. "We actually have to work together to get the job done."

Lee, a leading figure in the tea party movement, said he was "pleased" by the candidate's praise.

"I didn't necessarily start the day out thinking I was going to get a shout-out from Hillary Clinton," he said, adding, "The Smarter Sentencing Act is a really good bill. We need to pass it."

But Lee also noted that the new coalition of aisle-crossers Clinton highlighted is not just composed of Republicans who have seen the light — it also includes plenty of Democrats who are changing their positions, including Clinton herself.

On the issue of criminal sentencing, for example, Lee has drafted legislation with liberal Sen. Dick Durbin that would soften and in some cases eliminate federally mandated sentences for various types of drug offenders. But while Lee said the bill has been applauded by "prominent liberal Democrats and some prominent conservative Republicans," many old-guard moderates in both parties have been resistant.

He said Democrats like Clinton have "absolutely" evolved on the issue, and some are only now conceding "that the one-size-fits-all mandatory minimum approach ... is not one that can be treated as though it's etched in stone."

Lee's comments echo those of his libertarian-leaning Senate colleague. On Wednesday Paul's presidential campaign released a statement arguing that Hillary Clinton is "trying to undo some of the harm inflicted by the Clinton administration" and "emulating proposals introduced by Senator Rand Paul over the last several years." The release cheekily added, "We welcome her to the fight."

Of course, America's left wing has long led the charge against tough-on-crime policies and aggressive policing tactics, which they argued had a ruinous effect on minority communities. But centrist Democrats like the Clintons looking to win national elections rarely aligned themselves with the left on these issues in the '80s and '90s. In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed a law that imposed harsher criminal sentences, expanded the death penalty, and allotted funds for more jails. Four years later, the first lady championed those policies in an op-ed, arguing for "tough measures that punish criminal behavior" and insisting that "young people who break the law are held accountable."

As a senator Clinton went on to co-sponsor legislation aimed at addressing racial profiling and strengthening ties between police and inner-city communities. And by 2008, as a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, she railed against the GOP for their silence on these issues.

"You don't hear the Republicans talking about any of this," she said at the time. "You don't hear them talking about the disgrace of a criminal justice system that incarcerates so many more African Americans proportionately than whites."

But the political landscape has shifted considerably since then — while Clinton, serving as secretary of state, was withdrawn from domestic policy debates. Within the Republican Party, an ascendant libertarian movement has joined forces with certain elements of the religious right to advocate for an approach to criminal justice they say is more focused on efficacy, cost efficiency, and compassion.

The ideas have not yet fully taken hold in the GOP, where candidates have long benefited politically from their party's reputation for cracking down on criminals. And just this week, a noisy chorus of talk-radio conservatives has used racially charged rhetoric to deride the "thugs" behind the unrest in Baltimore. But among the movement's policy wonks, legislative efforts like Lee's are increasingly popular.

Meanwhile, Lee contended that conservatives should see validation in the images coming out of Baltimore. For example, local faith leaders have reportedly played a key role in easing tensions and quelling violence in recent days — evidence, he said, that public policy should be geared toward strengthening churches and other private institutions with local credibility.

"I think it's impossible for me to look at what's happening there and not see the importance of civil society," Lee said.

And in the now-famous footage of Baltimore mother Toya Graham indignantly dragging her teenage son off the chaotic streets, Lee saw the importance of fortifying families — a consistent emphasis in policymaking by social conservatives like himself.

"Moms are awesome," Lee said, adding that his own mother would have done the same thing to him in that position. "I'm not sure I know a mom who wouldn't."



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1FBwWot

Chief Justice's Question Highlights Sex-Discrimination Argument Against Marriage Bans

The claim could be used by Chief Justice John Roberts to strike down bans on same-sex couples’ marriages. The argument isn’t new, though, having appeared throughout the past decades of marriage fights — since the 1970s.

At Tuesday's marriage arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts made a brief comment that launched speculation he could join Justice Anthony Kennedy and the more liberal justices in voting against bans on same-sex couples' marriages.

At Tuesday's marriage arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts made a brief comment that launched speculation he could join Justice Anthony Kennedy and the more liberal justices in voting against bans on same-sex couples' marriages.

Roberts notably disagreed with the court's 2013 ruling that struck down the Defense of Marriage Act.

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Getty Images

What did Roberts say? He asked the attorney for Michigan about sex discrimination.

What did Roberts say? He asked the attorney for Michigan about sex discrimination.

"That theory had gotten only slight attention in scores of lawsuits challenging bans on same-sex marriage," Liptak wrote, adding that it is "unlikely to serve as the central rationale" for a Supreme Court opinion striking down the marriage bans.

Whelan goes on to call the argument "badly confused and incompatible with Roberts' vaunted commitment to judicial restraint."


View Entire List ›



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1ziEQlj

Sports: Mayweather-Pacquiao Is a $300 Million Bout Not Worth Much for Boxing

Sports on TIME.com

Mayweather-Pacquiao Is a $300 Million Bout Not Worth Much for Boxing


One bout between fading fighters won't revive a sport's relevance

Published on May 1, 2015 at 04:47AM

Shared at 0 shares/hour


Read more: http://ift.tt/1E0uRNw

The Reality Behind The Argument Between Justice Sotomayor And Oklahoma Over The Death Penalty

“Nothing you say or read to me am I going to believe, frankly, until I see with my own eyes the context, okay?”

TIM SLOAN / Getty Images

On Wednesday, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused the state of Oklahoma of lying numerous times in their briefs about the drugs they use to execute death-row inmates.

At issue in the case is whether midazolam, the drug of choice for Oklahoma and several other states, is capable of anesthetizing inmates before they are given painful and lethal drugs. Experts say Oklahoma's third drug, for example, feels like liquid fire.

"I am substantially disturbed that in your brief you made factual statements that were not supported by those sources [you cited, and were] in fact directly contradicted," Sotomayor told Oklahoma Solicitor General Patrick Wyrick. "So nothing you say or read to me am I going to believe, frankly, until I see with my own eyes the context, okay?"

Sotomayor said she found "many" examples of Oklahoma playing fast and loose with the facts, but said she would list out three. (She actually only listed two examples before the arguments shifted to another topic.)

The problem: Pharmacology experts say midazolam is not capable of general anesthesia. Oklahoma quotes the drug's label as saying midazolam's "[a]nticipated effects range from mild sedation to deep levels of sedation virtually equivalent to a state of general anesthesia where the patient may require external support of vital functions."

That quotation is on the label; the issue, as Sotomayor pointed out, is what comes before it. The quotation is actually in a section that's talking about what would happen when midazolam is paired with other drugs:


View Entire List ›



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1EUVhqz

Report: Obama Library Is Headed To Chicago's South Side

The University of Chicago won.

Win McNamee / Getty Images

The University of Chicago has won a bid to build Barack Obama's presidential library and an announcement is expected to come the week after next, multiple outlets reported on Thursday night.

The development is a major victory for the city of Chicago and its mayor, former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, who engaged in a months-long battle to fend off other bids, including an attractive one by Columbia University in New York, Obama's alma mater.

News that Chicago was successful in drawing the Obama library and museum, came in the form of a phone call from the president and Democratic leaders last Friday, according to a CBS Chicago report. On the call, Obama thanked them for passing legislation in Springfield that effectively removed any of the last remaining obstacles to building the library on public park land. House Speaker Mike Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton were present, according to the report.

The University of Chicago's bid revolved around two sites — one at Washington Park and the other at Jackson Park. It is not immediately clear which site will be the location of the library.

Cassandra J. Francis, the former CEO of Friends of the Parks, one of the most vocal critics to building the library on park land was an advocate to build on another site. Francis stepped down earlier this month. Francis could not be reached for comment.

The report said Obama won't have further involvement in the project until he's out of office. By January 2017, his main focus will likely be on fundraising; the library is expected to cost a half-billion dollars, while officials say the library will create close to 2,000 permanent jobs and drive millions of dollars to Chicago's South Side.

The Obama foundation did not immediately reply to an email requesting comment.



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1bk07zV

Sports: Tampa Bay Selects Jameis Winston as No. 1 NFL Draft Pick

Sports on TIME.com

Tampa Bay Selects Jameis Winston as No. 1 NFL Draft Pick


He won the Heisman Trophy in 2013

Published on May 1, 2015 at 03:34AM

Shared at 0 shares/hour


Read more: http://ift.tt/1OKr2XS

Live Updates: 2015 NFL Draft

The first round of the 2015 NFL Draft takes place in Chicago on Thursday.


View Entire List ›


via IFTTT

Congress Schools Education Apps On Student Privacy

A new bill would provide K–12 students with robust data privacy protections.

Christopher Furlong / Getty Images

As public schools scramble to answer calls for educational innovation with tablet programs and online learning systems, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are growing increasingly concerned about the privacy risks such tools pose to students.

On Wednesday, Rep. Jared Polis, a Democrat from Colorado, and Rep. Luke Messer, a Republican from Indiana, introduced the Student Digital Privacy and Parental Rights Act, legislation that would update the privacy protections afforded to students as the schools they attend embrace digital education. Specifically, the bill prohibits education companies from selling student data to third parties or using it for noneducational purposes. Also forbidden: targeted advertising.

"Digital student records, learning apps, electronic testing, and classroom tablets all mean that an enormous amount of information is being collected on students, from the day they enter kindergarten to the moment they graduate or enter the workforce," Rep. Polis said. "Students and parents have every right to expect that the millions of data points collected on them every day are safeguarded in a responsible way."

The student data privacy bill is intended to do just that. Not only does it ensure that ed-tech companies disclose the types of K–12 student data they collect and how it is used, it also requires them to enforce strong data protections and to notify the Federal Trade Commission and any affected parties in the event of a security breach.

"Every day, students turn over hoards of data without adequate privacy safeguards," Khaliah Barnes, director of the Student Privacy Project at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told BuzzFeed News. "And many companies are churning profits from students' information and otherwise taking and using student information out of context."

Though critical of the weaker privacy protections in earlier drafts of the bill, Barnes now supports it. She said the bill as it is currently written empowers parents and educators, and offers strong protections against data mining.

"Both sides of the aisle can agree that student information is not for sale," Barnes said. "Students should have the freedom to learn in the classroom without the fear that every click, everything that they write is used in a way that they did not intend."

While many states have student data privacy laws, the Student Digital Privacy and Parental Rights Act would create a federal baseline to support the patchwork of state law. Supporters hope the bill will serve as a precursor to future legislation that will extend privacy protections to all students, not just K–12.


via IFTTT

Big Insurer Expands Coverage For Telemedicine

It just got easier for 1 million UnitedHealthcare members to see the doctor from the comfort of home.

Doctor on Demand

UnitedHealthcare, the largest health insurance carrier in the United States, is widening its footprint in telemedicine.

On Thursday, the company began offering insurance coverage for telemedicine services to a larger subset of subscribers, allowing 1 million people to receive virtual medical help from Doctor on Demand, the NowClinic, and Amwell. For a maximum copay of $50 per visit, eligible subscribers can chat with a physician through their smartphones, tablets, or computers.

United's announcement is a victory for the emerging industry. Patients with short-term issues like sinus infections, skin rashes, and pinkeye — not emergency situations or chronic conditions — can now turn to the 1,400 or so physicians behind Doctor on Demand, the venture-backed startup co-founded by Dr. Phil. If patients report their conditions are continuing or worsening, Doctor on Demand will refer them to an in-person physician, said CEO and co-founder Adam Jackson.

"Every Doctor on Demand visit is preventing a more expensive in-office visit," he told BuzzFeed News.

With the nation facing an estimated shortage of 45,000 primary care physicians over the next decade, United's move is timely and recognizes the growing popularity of seeking health advice from the comfort of your home. Worldwide, the number of patients using telehealth services is expected to hit 7 million in 2018, 20 times the number in 2013, according to projections by IHS Technology.

One of the biggest hurdles slowing telemedicine's adoption has been insurance coverage. Medicare and Medicaid have historically treated an online doctor's consultation as different from an in-person visit, sometimes paying for telehealth visits when a patient lives in a rural area. And while some states like California support the practice, others, like Texas, are moving to restrict it.

United's announcement makes telemedicine services now available to people in self-funded employer health plans, and will expand next year to people with employer-sponsored insurance and individual plans. (Some United members have already been covered for NowClinic visits.) In total, by Jan. 1, 2016, the number of members with access will reach about 20 million, United said.


via IFTTT

Steve King Says Kagan And Ginsburg Should Recuse Themselves From Marriage Case Or Be Judged By History

“…when you’re sitting there on the bench and there’s no one in America that believes you can find any other way except in favor of same-sex marriage then I think their judgement’s gonna be forever challenged by history…”

Darren McCollester / Getty Images

Rep. Steve King of Iowa says that two liberal Supreme Court justices should recuse themselves from the landmark same-sex marriage case currently before court because they officiated a same-sex wedding.

King, speaking to a local radio host, said they would be "forever challenged by history" if they did not.

"That's their call to do that," King told Mickelson in the Morning on Tuesday. "If I were they, I would. I think they've already -- when you're sitting there on the bench and there's no one in America that believes you can find any other way except in favor of same-sex marriage, then I think their judgement's gonna be forever challenged by history and that'd be appropriate for them at that point. If it were me I would recuse myself."

"Of course, I wouldn't have conducted same-sex marriages as a justice and cast those kind of aspersions on a decision that was likely to come before that court."

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan have presided over weddings for same-sex couples in the past..

Earlier this week, the Louisiana House of Representatives passed a resolution imploring Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan to withdraw from the case because "they have engaged in public conduct suggestive of bias." A spokeswoman for Louisiana's Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal told BuzzFeed News that it was fair to question the justices' bias.

Here's the audio:

w.soundcloud.com



Source BuzzFeed - Politics http://ift.tt/1HVNIPo